The death of detail

Minimalism may seem like the perfect solution to overstimulation, with its clean lines and serene palettes, but its widespread adoption reveals subtle yet impactful risks. What started as a post-WWII art movement aimed at simplicity has evolved into a global aesthetic that oftentimes stifles creativity, erases cultural identity, and paradoxically fuels consumerism.

This aesthetic, known for its open floor plans, neutral tones, and simple lines, originally rejected extravagance and elitism. Yet today, it often encourages a curated lifestyle where possessions are discarded if they don’t fit the aesthetic, only to be replaced by “minimalist” items, such as neutral-toned books or wooden bead decorations, purchased purely for appearances. Despite its focus on essentials, minimalism has become another form of consumerism, creating spaces that feel cold and alienating when taken to extremes.

Public spaces and architecture face similar challenges. The replacement of London’s iconic red telephone booths with minimalist alternatives erases cultural heritage, while traditional park benches with ornate, curvilinear designs are swapped for impersonal, square-cut options. These changes prioritize a homogenised global aesthetic over cultural distinctiveness, leaving cities less vibrant and inviting.

While minimalism can reduce anxiety and bring clarity, it risks stripping away the warmth and individuality that give spaces meaning. A balance is essential to preserving cultural heritage and fostering designs that are functional yet rich in character. Thoughtfully applied, minimalism can achieve its benefits without erasing the beauty and complexity of unique environments.